Re: Digest for 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - 25 Messages in 6 Topics

[Jim Altemose <jaltemoose@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Jeff.

There's something for me to think about.  I've been having a vibration
between 62 and 68 MPH and I was blaming the new front drums and hubs.

But I also recently installed re-arched rear springs which raised my
butt up about 2 inches.  Now, that was almost 2 months ago and I'm
pretty sure I drove 65 mph between that and changing my drums and
didn't notice a problem.

But on the other hand I have trouble remembering what I did last week.

Something to consider.

- Jim
Jim Altemose, Long Island, NY
'63 Polara 500 (Max Wedge)
'63 Polara 500 (383)
'65 Belvedere I (Street Wedge)
'71 Bronco


On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Jeff Adams <ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My 64 Polara has had a vibration for a long time. I've suspected it was the
> pinion angle since the car is raised a few inches in the rear, so a few
> weeks a go I let some air out of the rear shocks and a lot of the vibration
> went away, which kinda proves the culprit is probably the pinion angle. Just
> FYI.
>
> Jeff
>
> ________________________________
> To: 1962to1965mopars+digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: 1962to1965mopars+noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Digest for 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - 25 Messages in 6
> Topics
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:04:05 +0000
>
>   Today's Topic Summary
> Group: http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars/topics
>
> vibration at 65 mph? [6 Updates]
> Nostalgic Super Stock Video [3 Updates]
> hood bumpers [7 Updates]
> Just daydreaming...Sleeper ideas? [6 Updates]
> Small Question [2 Updates]
> "Golden Anniversary" [ was Re: Welcome New Member - 1964 Dodge 440] [1
> Update]
>
>  Topic: vibration at 65 mph?
>
> Mike & Deb <lefevre@xxxxxxxxxx> Jul 14 09:32PM -0400 ^
>
> Hi Jim,
> Many moons ago the dealership I worked at had a spin balancer that
> balanced wheel/tire/drum all together. If I recall the machine was built
> by Hunter. They were sort of dangerous but balanced very well. You might
> find an old shop that still uses one.
> Mike LeFevre
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/14/2011 11:03 AM, Jim Altemose wrote:
>
>
> Doug J <63sprtfury@xxxxxxxxx> Jul 14 10:56PM -0500 ^
>
> Yup,, used 'em. Dangerous when it came off the wheel, but no better
> balance can be had.
> We used to do the rear wheels on non posi cars at 45 mph (90 real
> time). Learned to do that by laying my head on the quarter panel
> above the wheel... When yer head stopped vibrating,,, the wheel was
> balanced.!!! My boss said I was the best bubble balancer in
> 3 states,,,,,,, I said he was the best spin balancer in the U.S.
> He's long since gone,,, but I stand by the statement. !!!
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Mike & Deb <lefevre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrot
>
> --
> Doug,
> '63 Sport Fury 'vert
>
>
> Jim Altemose <jaltemoose@xxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 09:49AM -0400 ^
>
> Doing a little research on the Internet and I see people mention "hub
> runout" in relation to vibration at highway speeds. What is hub
> runout?
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Jim
> Jim Altemose, Long Island, NY
> '63 Polara 500 (Max Wedge)
> '63 Polara 500 (383)
> '65 Belvedere I (Street Wedge)
> '71 Bronco
>
>
>
> Dodger7998@xxxxxxx Jul 15 10:20AM -0400 ^
>
> Runout would be any dimensional changes from original specs, such as loose
> tolerances on the machine work used to produce the item, or core shift when
> molded,,, IE,,,,,, the part when manufactured ran out side of specs
>
>
> In a message dated 7/15/2011 8:49:33 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> jaltemoose@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> What is hub
> runout?
>
>
> MO <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 10:30AM -0700 ^
>
> Thanks Dodger!, you just answered a question I mever tryed too figger
> out ! I just thought runout was a general term that meant the part
> was not straight. ie: That would be" run outside "of intended
> tolerencs fer sure!................................MO
>
>
>
> Dodger7998@xxxxxxx Jul 15 01:54PM -0400 ^
>
> The term "run out" is a slang also used when testing an item,,,, such as
> how did the car run out,,, which also would go back to ,, where was its
> performance/handling/ride/etc,,,,, compared to what is in your mind as to
> what
> the expected specs should be
>
>
> In a message dated 7/15/2011 12:30:51 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Thanks Dodger!, you just answered a question I mever tryed too figger
> out ! I just thought runout was a general term that meant the part
> was not straight. ie: That would be" run outside "of intended
> tolerencs fer sure!................................MO
>
>> Runout would be any dimensional changes from original specs, such as
> loose
>> tolerances on the machine work used to produce the item, or core shift
> when
>
>> jaltemo...@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> What is hub
>> runout?
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations
> as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
> the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic.
> Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
>
>  Topic: Nostalgic Super Stock Video
>
> "Stephen Andrachek" <s.andrachek@xxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 07:44AM -0400 ^
>
> At least 90% Mopars. They continue to dominate just like they always have.
>
> Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWi5MfLbZT0&feature=related
>
>
> "waedison@xxxxxxxxxxx" <waedison@xxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 07:59AM -0700 ^
>
> That is just SO COOL !
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Stephen Andrachek" <s.andrachek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, Jul 15, 2011 4:44 am
> Subject: Nostalgic Super Stock Video
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> At least 90% Mopars. They continue to dominate just like they always have.
>
> Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWi5MfLbZT0&feature=related
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
>
> MO <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 10:44AM -0700 ^
>
> At about 1:20 the white 64 Dodge. --All bristled up and shak'in her
> booty during burnout----OHHH BUDDY! that gets my motor
> runn'in..............................MO
>
> On Jul 15, 6:44 am, "Stephen Andrachek" <s.andrac...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
>  Topic: hood bumpers
>
> Michael Phelps <mikeph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 14 09:35PM -0400 ^
>
> I just got a full set for my car from Year One for $29.99. It included the
> hood (6) the doors (4) the trunk (4) though mine only needed two for the
> trunk. Also the kit came with bumpers for the ashtray and the glovebox. And
> four that, well I haven't figured out where they go yet, maybe the gas
> filler door/license plate mount.
>
> Michael Phelps
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> "Donnie Schanz Jr" <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 14 10:11PM -0400 ^
>
> Thanks Mike.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Phelps" <mikeph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 9:35 PM
> Subject: Re: hood bumpers
>
>
> I just got a full set for my car from Year One for $29.99. It included the
> hood (6) the doors (4) the trunk (4) though mine only needed two for the
> trunk. Also the kit came with bumpers for the ashtray and the glovebox. And
> four that, well I haven't figured out where they go yet, maybe the gas
> filler door/license plate mount.
>
> Michael Phelps
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
>
> Ruth Gordon <kpmvn4wrd@xxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 02:12AM -0700 ^
>
> Perhaps try garygoers.com, he'll know also,
> Ruth
> On
>
>
> Mike & Deb <lefevre@xxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 07:38AM -0400 ^
>
> Hi fellas,
> Does any one reproduce the emergency brake stop bumper?
> Mike LeFevre
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/15/2011 5:12 AM, Ruth Gordon wrote:
>
>
> Michael Phelps <mikeph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 10:07AM -0400 ^
>
> Is there one? Maybe it's one of the extra bumpers I got in the kit from Year
> One. I'll check later and see.
>
> Michael Phelps
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> Mike & Deb <lefevre@xxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 01:02PM -0400 ^
>
> Michael,
> The em brake up stop is a rectangular shaped bumper with a "blade" style
> retainer.
> Mike LeFevre
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/15/2011 10:07 AM, Michael Phelps wrote:
>
>
> Michael Phelps <mikeph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 01:23PM -0400 ^
>
> Like the ones that go on the back underside of the trunk lid? Because I got
> four in the kit but I only needed two for my trunk. I just assumed they were
> for other vehicle applications.
>
> Michael Phelps
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
>  Topic: Just daydreaming...Sleeper ideas?
>
> fd_colorado <fd_colorado@xxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 08:11AM -0700 ^
>
> Sleeper Build
>
> Just doing a bit of daydreaming here... maybe you guys have some
> ideas, how would you spend your money and what kind of times do you
> think you'd achieve?
>
> the car:
>
> 1963 Plymouth Belvedere 4 dr sedan, 318ci/2bbl, 727 auto, car is
> totally original, e.g. 14" wheels etc. No PS, PB or air cond.
>
> Parts budget of $2500 - $5000
>
> some of my thoughts are...
>
> front disc brake conversion
> if possible, widen stock rear wheels and install street/drag tire
> awhile back Hot Rod did a 318 budget rebuild netting 406hp for ~$1500
> bucks
>
> ???
>
>
> fd_colorado <fd_colorado@xxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 08:24AM -0700 ^
>
> Stealth Pkg - $30
>
> roof rack $20 -- a nice touch
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/36081480@N08/3433945041/
> I Love Bingo - bumper sticker
> Grandkids On Board sign - for rear window
> Chrismas tree air freshener
>
>
>
> Dodger7998@xxxxxxx Jul 15 11:43AM -0400 ^
>
> Drop in a late model 360,,,,,,we all know that a poly can be built, but the
> parts and availability of the later engines are unmatched,,,,,,,, you
> will end up with more HP, for less bucks,,,,,
>
>
> In a message dated 7/15/2011 10:11:13 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> fd_colorado@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Sleeper Build
>
> Just doing a bit of daydreaming here... maybe you guys have some
> ideas, how would you spend your money and what kind of times do you
> think you'd achieve?
>
> the car:
>
> 1963 Plymouth Belvedere 4 dr sedan, 318ci/2bbl, 727 auto, car is
> totally original, e.g. 14" wheels etc. No PS, PB or air cond.
>
> Parts budget of $2500 - $5000
>
> some of my thoughts are...
>
> front disc brake conversion
> if possible, widen stock rear wheels and install street/drag tire
> awhile back Hot Rod did a 318 budget rebuild netting 406hp for ~$1500
> bucks
>
> ???
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations
> as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
> the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic.
> Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
>
> "Donnie Schanz Jr" <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 12:29PM -0400 ^
>
> Why would you waste $$$ on disc brakes? My Maxxie runs 11's all day and
> stops with the drums. Too much $$$ to spend on stopping and you should spend
> it on going forward. I would put a 100 shot of NOS before I would do discs.
> My buddy added it to his little 289 Mustang and what a difference. It well
> worth the $$$ and not to dangerous. I am not an NOS guy, but I was
> impressed.
>
> Donnie
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "fd_colorado" <fd_colorado@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse"
> <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 11:11 AM
> Subject: Just daydreaming...Sleeper ideas?
>
>
> Sleeper Build
>
> Just doing a bit of daydreaming here... maybe you guys have some
> ideas, how would you spend your money and what kind of times do you
> think you'd achieve?
>
> the car:
>
> 1963 Plymouth Belvedere 4 dr sedan, 318ci/2bbl, 727 auto, car is
> totally original, e.g. 14" wheels etc. No PS, PB or air cond.
>
> Parts budget of $2500 - $5000
>
> some of my thoughts are...
>
> front disc brake conversion
> if possible, widen stock rear wheels and install street/drag tire
> awhile back Hot Rod did a 318 budget rebuild netting 406hp for ~$1500
> bucks
>
> ???
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
>
> Mike & Deb <lefevre@xxxxxxxxxx> Jul 15 01:04PM -0400 ^
>
> Turbo charge it!
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/15/2011 11:11 AM, fd_colorado wrote:
>
>
> "Gary Pavlovich" <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx> Jul 15 10:19AM -0700 ^
>
> I would agree with Dodger that the 360 can build easy HP as the recipes are
> numerous and you have any shop that can do the build. However, you need to
> determine what your real goals and intentions for your car is. Reading your
> e-mail lets me know it is an “original” car so do you want to have the
> original look with a wallop packed under the hood – ala, sleeper? How much
> HP do you want vs. what you really need to lose traction on the street with
> Drag Radials?
>
> We can only give you our opinions as to what we would do but we know what
> kind of car we want to build.
>
> Saying that, I will give you my opinion and best guess as to what you are
> looking for in your build; pump gas engine with enough HP and torque to
> smoke the tires at will but not unmanageable street manners – it must start
> easily, not require extensive tuning to maintain driving pleasure, not
> require more than 3500rpm stall convertor and a 3.91 rear gear...a nice
> looking, hard running, sleeper car, with that nostalgic 1963MOPAR look & Hot
> Rod stance (perhaps aftermarket rims and 235/.60-14 or 15 Drag Radials;
> Hoosier/BFG/MT) enough mods to stay within your budget w/o compromising your
> “performance.” Need to assess your true street to strip driving ratio as
> well.
>
> I would choose the 318 Poly in Hot Street modified form or a 360 Stroker
> Poly.
>
> Reasons:
> No expense and hassle of buying a 360 core engine and changing the motor
> mounts and swapping to an externally balanced convertor for the externally
> balanced 360 engine.
> The 360 is ubiquitous (everywhere/common) and doesn’t look “right/correct/or
> impressive at all” in the engine bay of a 1963 Plymouth” and will maintain
> or increase the value and or desirability of your car.
> It will also “personalize” your car...think about what that means to you.
>
> The 318 Poly is impressive looking (wider than a 440) and appears
> correct/nostalgic/generates more attention & questions than a HEMI in your
> engine bay...that really is worth something at cruise nights...
> “ “ “ will not require any chassis modifications other than to replaced the
> old parts – no modifications/adjustments to anything.
> “ “ “ High Performance parts are all available and easily obtained new
> except for the intake manifold and there are plenty available on E-bay and
> swap meets to make this a non-issue; especially the dual quads.
> The 318 Poly will meet and exceed all your HP & Torque goals without
> exceeding your budget and easily make 425HP and 450ft.lbs.torque in 360”
> econo Stroker trim and 350-375HP in HOT stock stroke trim.
> NOTE: read Nick Tiberio’s e-mail comments about his 360 Stroker Poly I
> forwarded to this list and question some Poly builder/owners about the pros
> & cons of their “built” Polys vs. other options.
> You don’t need more than approx. 350-375 REAL HP to reach your goals
> outlined in your e-mail with your chassis.
>
> HOT Stock Stroke Poly:
> OEM pistons with head mill to achieve 9 to 9.5 to one ratio; 10 to 1 can be
> had as well.
> Port & polish the heads – 211cfm intake is enough flow for 425HP and 450ft.
> lbs. of torque; this with headers/exhaust gives you the most bang for your
> buck with an aftermarket camshaft and four barrel induction.
> 264/.450” (222@.050”) 110LC solid to 262/.460” (214@.050”) HYD. HP Poly Cam;
> or 284/.480-.510” (240-242@.050”)108-110LC Poly Solid Cam to 270/.480”
> (230@.050”) 110LC HYD. HP Poly Cam
> Four barrel intake or dual quad
> Stock 1.84/1.56” valves OK or upgrade to 1.94/1.60” if budget allows
> TTI Headers a must with good 2 1/2” dual exhaust w/H or X pipe through
> Dynomax Super Turbos or Flowmasters...personal choice here
> A 2500-3000rpm high stall convertor is recommended, but not necessary for
> the first stage of cam profiles but mandatory for the second choice of cam
> profiles and preferably a 3000-3500rpm convertor
> Rear gears will greatly enhance any engine modifications and a minimum of
> 3.23 gears are requisite for any build past stock if you want to “feel” the
> value-added to your engine build; 3.23-3.91 for the first step and 3.55-4.10
> for the second step recommended.
> Electronic Ignition for stock and modified Poly recommended
> Engine balancing and unleaded seats are “standard” in all engine builds as
> far as I am concerned.
>
> 360 Stroker Poly:
> All the above with the exception of using LA low-compression truck pistons
> and fly-cutting the pistons for an intake valve relief; choice of 9 to 10 to
> 1 compression ratio.
>
> Please e-mail me off-list for more information or a list of the parts
> suppliers, local machine shops, and current prices I have been able to
> catalog for our “PolyHeads” to make your shopping and engine building easy.
> Prices are always changing in the marketplace but I try to do a search for
> the best part at the lowest price and pass it along to our Mail List people.
>
> Take care,
> Gary Pavlovich
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 8:43 AM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Just daydreaming...Sleeper ideas?
>
> Drop in a late model 360,,,,,,we all know that a poly can be built, but the
> parts and availability of the later engines are unmatched,,,,,,,, you will
> end up with more HP, for less bucks,,,,,
>
> In a message dated 7/15/2011 10:11:13 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> fd_colorado@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Sleeper Build
>
> Just doing a bit of daydreaming here... maybe you guys have some
> ideas, how would you spend your money and what kind of times do you
> think you'd achieve?
>
> the car:
>
> 1963 Plymouth Belvedere 4 dr sedan, 318ci/2bbl, 727 auto, car is
> totally original, e.g. 14" wheels etc. No PS, PB or air cond.
>
> Parts budget of $2500 - $5000
>
> some of my thoughts are...
>
> front disc brake conversion
> if possible, widen stock rear wheels and install street/drag tire
> awhile back Hot Rod did a 318 budget rebuild netting 406hp for ~$1500
> bucks
>
> ???
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
>
>  Topic: Small Question
>
> Allen Sullivant <dart440@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jul 14 08:49PM -0500 ^
>
> Greetings,
>
> My 62 Dart sedan is sitting up right now, outside, slowly going
> to pot. It would be drivable were I to get the carb rebuilt (float
> stuck, leaks gas all over the place) and the blown exhaust manifold
> gaskets replaced so it doesn't sound like an Alco locomotive on
> steroids. But there's one thing I'd like to take care of, the
> better to keep things dry on the inside, which is this:
>
> The driver's side rear door don't latch any longer. It just bangs
> without catching. The door handle mechanism is not stuck, either
> inside or on the outside. The little star wheel in the door spins
> freely. Any ideas or easy fixes?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Allen Sullivant
> Brentwood, Tn.
>
>
> neal zimmerman <neal.zimmerman@xxxxxxxxx> Jul 14 06:53PM -0700 ^
>
> hows the droop factor of the door? hinges shot?? also could the
> receptacle in the door jamb have shifted? banging means metal on metal
> is occuring most likely
> neal
>
>
>  Topic: "Golden Anniversary" [ was Re: Welcome New Member - 1964 Dodge 440]
>
> Ray Bell <raybell46@xxxxxxxxx> Jul 14 06:37PM -0700 ^
>
> Ron Martin had his '64 wagon 'Golden Anniversary Model' on the old
> dodgepolara.com site (is that still around?) and I'm sure he told me
> it was a limited edition in special colours.
>
> Gorgeous old wagon!
>
> Ray
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>

-- 
--
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.